00:23:00 bad net hair day 00:29:04 timbl-lap has joined #rdfig 00:29:04 timbl has quit (Read error to timbl[146.115.75.99]: Connection reset by peer) 01:23:39 timbl has joined #rdfig 01:23:39 timbl-lap has quit (Read error to timbl-lap[146.115.75.99]: Connection reset by peer) 02:32:02 GabeW has joined #rdfig 03:12:52 timbl-lap has joined #rdfig 03:12:52 timbl has quit (Read error to timbl[146.115.75.99]: Connection reset by peer) 03:13:38 timbl has joined #rdfig 03:33:45 does anyone know if logger has been released yet? 03:33:51 yes, it has 03:34:08 I was looking around couldn't find it 03:34:29 cvs.ilrt.org as i recall 03:34:31 I shocked myself the other day searching for my favorite search topics and found myself talking on this channel 03:34:34 that's kind of cool 03:34:39 heh 03:37:15 hehe does it have a code name? 03:37:46 logger? it's in http://cvs.ilrt.org/cvsweb/redland/logger/ 03:37:54 oh redland 03:37:54 ok 03:40:35 thank you 03:40:45 no prob 03:54:19 hi urgen 03:57:00 *smirk* 03:57:02 :-) 04:07:30 timbl-lap has quit (Read error to timbl-lap[146.115.75.99]: Connection reset by peer) 04:07:30 timbl has quit (Read error to timbl[146.115.75.99]: Connection reset by peer) 04:08:51 em has quit (Ping timeout for em[dhcp065-024-049-027.columbus.rr.com]) 04:09:02 timbl has joined #rdfig 04:09:05 timbl-lap has joined #rdfig 04:10:22 em has joined #rdfig 04:12:25 urgen has quit (Ping timeout for urgen[63-151-74-176.slo-dyn.charterpipeline.com]) 04:32:07 urgen has joined #rdfig 04:56:00 http://www.openhealth.org/RDF/RDFSurfaceSyntax 04:56:00 A: http://www.openhealth.org/RDF/RDFSurfaceSyntax from jonb 04:56:31 A:|Tree Regular Language Grammar for RDF 04:56:31 titled item A 04:57:48 A: [http://www.openhealth.org/RDF/RDF1.rng|RDF 1.0] grammar 04:57:48 commented item A 04:58:20 A: [http://www.openhealth.org/RDF/RDF.rng|simplified RDF syntax] grammar 04:58:21 commented item A 04:58:26 urgen has left channel 05:02:07 timbl has quit (Read error to timbl[146.115.75.99]: Connection reset by peer) 05:02:07 timbl-lap has quit (Read error to timbl-lap[146.115.75.99]: Connection reset by peer) 05:03:37 timbl has joined #rdfig 05:03:40 timbl-lap has joined #rdfig 05:17:15 timbl has quit (Ping timeout for timbl[146.115.75.99]) 05:17:18 timbl-lap has quit (Ping timeout for timbl-lap[146.115.75.99]) 05:52:36 em has quit (Ping timeout for em[dhcp065-024-049-027.columbus.rr.com]) 05:54:37 em has joined #rdfig 06:47:54 DanC_ has quit (Ping timeout for DanC_[adsl-208-190-202-241.dsl.kscymo.swbell.net]) 06:48:24 GabeW has quit (Read error to GabeW[adsl-216-103-252-4.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net]: Connection reset by peer) 06:49:06 GabeW has joined #rdfig 06:49:30 DanC_ has joined #rdfig 07:17:48 GabeW has quit (Read error to GabeW[adsl-216-103-252-4.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net]: EOF from client) 08:47:34 jang has joined #rdfig 09:37:02 baud has joined #rdfig 09:38:24 baud has quit ([x]chat) 09:38:37 baud has joined #rdfig 10:05:28 timbl has joined #rdfig 10:05:32 timbl-lap has joined #rdfig 10:13:19 libby has joined #rdfig 10:20:05 http://www.elpub.org/analytic06.htm 10:20:06 B: http://www.elpub.org/analytic06.htm from libby 10:20:19 B:|El.pub Analytic Issue Number 6 10:20:20 titled item B 10:20:33 B: The semantic web - will it work? 10:20:33 commented item B 10:23:08 B: by Geoffrey Stephenson of Knowledge Exchange Technologies 10:23:09 commented item B 10:25:10 timbl has quit (Ping timeout for timbl[146.115.75.99]) 10:25:14 timbl-lap has quit (Ping timeout for timbl-lap[146.115.75.99]) 10:53:18 http://swordfish.rdfweb.org/calendar/links/index.rss 10:53:19 C: http://swordfish.rdfweb.org/calendar/links/index.rss from libby 10:53:46 C:| Gigantic RSS 1.0 channel for RDF calendar taskforce links 10:53:46 titled item C 10:54:10 C: links also available as html: http://swordfish.rdfweb.org/calendar/links/index.html 10:54:11 commented item C 10:54:29 C: idea nicked off this excellent chump 10:54:29 commented item C 11:59:20 jonb-gk has joined #rdfig 12:54:17 * jonb-gk waves 12:55:00 * sandro waves 12:55:02 sbp has joined #rdfig 13:12:01 sbp has quit (Ping timeout for sbp[p19s12a07.client.global.net.uk]) 14:02:43 jonb has left channel 14:36:23 AaronSw has quit (Ping timeout for AaronSw[c930384-a.hlndpk1.il.home.com]) 14:48:23 tav has quit (Ping timeout for tav[host217-34-73-22.btopenworld.com]) 14:49:05 tav has joined #rdfig 15:01:12 danbri has joined #rdfig 15:15:36 danbri has quit (Ping timeout for danbri[h0050ba016e0d.ne.mediaone.net]) 15:15:59 danbri has joined #rdfig 15:55:26 lasDesk has quit (turning into a pumpkin....) 16:09:02 AaronSw has joined #rdfig 16:09:20 grr, cable modem was down 16:13:02 GabeW has joined #rdfig 16:43:19 bijan has joined #rdfig 17:20:07 danbri has quit (Ping timeout for danbri[h0050ba016e0d.ne.mediaone.net]) 17:23:05 danbri has joined #rdfig 17:28:06 jonb-gk has quit (Leaving) 17:36:21 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Mar/0101.html 17:36:21 D: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Mar/0101.html from AaronSw 17:36:30 D:|DMOZ Cleaner 17:36:30 titled item D 17:36:42 D:a series of sed scripts to clean up the DMOZ dumps 17:36:42 commented item D 17:36:47 D: by Sergey Melnik 17:36:47 commented item D 17:36:54 libby has left channel 17:44:39 lasDesk has joined #rdfig 18:08:54 jang has quit (Ping timeout for jang[tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk]) 18:33:50 GabeW has quit (Read error to GabeW[adsl-216-103-252-4.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net]: EOF from client) 18:38:59 ArtB has joined #rdfig 19:26:25 sbp has joined #rdfig 19:53:25 sbp has quit (Ping timeout for sbp[pCBs12a07.client.global.net.uk]) 20:05:56 jang has joined #rdfig 20:23:18 grr, my email is down - if anyone is trying to send email to me, send it to aswartz@swartzfam.com 20:30:48 danja has joined #rdfig 21:00:02 GabeW has joined #rdfig 21:13:48 jonb has joined #rdfig 21:17:15 jonb has quit (rdfig) 21:29:32 GabeW has quit (Read error to GabeW[adsl-216-101-18-99.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net]: EOF from client) 21:31:45 anyone home here? 21:32:20 * danbri waves at las 21:33:47 sbp has joined #rdfig 21:34:37 * AaronSw waves to everybody 21:35:03 * sbp waves back 21:36:09 It's annoying that it's not possible to map from QName to QName in RDF, but what if there were some kind of new list of predicates to let you do that? [ a :QName; :namespace "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; :name "title"; :role :Attribute ] . ? 21:36:43 You mean like mvcb:prefix 21:36:58 Well, like that... TimBL also came up with :namespace, and I have that in the URI terms that we did 21:37:04 URI terms? 21:37:33 We should take this... oh, I mean, the URI Terms that we came up with at SWAG 21:38:01 we came up with uri terms? uri? 21:38:16 - http://purl.org/swag/uriterms I guess 21:39:06 you did :hasNamespace which is for "a certain piece of code" 21:39:33 i think we need something broader 21:39:38 Ah, yes. I agree 21:40:01 We need to be able to express that such and such a URI is part of a QName, and follows this particular role 21:40:13 Jon recently came up with aboutQ and resourceQ 21:40:39 But I'm not too certain how they would work: how do you specify over title="" 21:40:43 <AaronSw> why is the role of a QName important to the model? 21:41:11 <sbp> Because the QName is an object, an important first class object that cannot be referred to in the terms we have classically in RDF 21:43:01 <AaronSw> ok, but why does it matter if it's used as an element or attribute? 21:43:42 <danja> danja has quit (Ping timeout for danja[host213-122-77-170.btinternet.com]) 21:43:46 <sbp> Because the definitions are different. Refer to the appendices in the XMLNS specification 21:43:54 <sbp> <title> != title="" 21:44:12 <AaronSw> wait, are we talking about xml in general or just in rdf? 21:44:57 <sbp> We are talking about referring to QNames as they are implemented in XML, in RDF 21:45:28 <AaronSw> so why would you want to talk about <title> vs title="" -- they both are equivalent triples 21:46:13 <sbp> No, they're not. When referring to the semantics of <title>, that is a different set of semantics to title="" they are different QNames in that sense 21:46:32 <AaronSw> not according to rdf 21:46:39 <sbp> If you refer to http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/#ns-expnames you'll see the definitions that are made, although this is a non-normative section to XMLNS 21:46:58 <sbp> I'm talking about referring to XML QNames in RDF. Not RDF itself - RDF itself uses concetenation; fine 21:47:14 <AaronSw> ok, that makes more sense 21:47:17 <sbp> I'm saying that we can model XML QNames, if we just invent a few predicates; and that is all that we need to do 21:47:43 <AaronSw> you can model most anything... 21:47:51 <AaronSw> so is this leading up to rdf-based xml schemas? 21:48:23 <sbp> This is leading up to be able to refer to anything which has a QName, but no traditional URI. The XSD specification is the only spec. fromt he W3C which defines both QNames and URIs 21:48:50 <sbp> Stuff like SVG, MathML, XHTML and so on have useful semantics, but no URIs to refer to, only the QNames 21:49:27 <AaronSw> but often, the QNames are context-sensitive 21:49:40 <sbp> While I sent a note to www-html@w3.org asking fro URIs to refr to the XHTML QNames, I have a feling that no one was listening. At any rate, not everyone is going to make referrable URIs out of their QNames. That's the point 21:50:01 <sbp> QNames should have well defined contexts, otherwise they're just as pointless as a URI without a definition 21:50:43 <AaronSw> that's my point 21:51:02 <sbp> Well, for example, going back to XHTML title... 21:51:06 <AaronSw> people don't think of Qnames (and sometimes even URIs) as things that should have definitions 21:51:20 <sbp> We can use the following anonymous node to refer to <title> 21:52:11 <sbp> [ a :ExpEType; :type "title"; :ns "http://www.w3.org/1999/title" ] . 21:52:51 <sbp> s//title//xhtml 21:52:58 <AaronSw> ahh 21:53:02 <AaronSw> what's an ExpEType? 21:53:15 <sbp> expanded element type 21:53:55 <AaronSw> so why would you refer to title? 21:56:00 <danbri> * danbri waves, heads off in pursuit of an evening... 21:56:05 <danbri> danbri has quit () 21:56:49 <sbp> Why would you refer to <title>? Say you come up with a new langauge, that has a <label> element, that has exactly the same role as <xhtml:title> 21:57:18 <sbp> [ a :ExpEType; :type "label"; :ns "http://example.org/#" ] daml:equivalentTo [ a :ExpEType; :type "title"; :ns "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" ] . 22:04:01 <sbp> So the following XML:- 22:04:01 <sbp> <section xmlns="urn:com:books-r-us"> 22:04:02 <sbp> <title>Book-Signing Event 22:04:02 22:04:02 22:04:02 22:04:04 22:04:06 22:04:12 Has the following QNames:- 22:04:14 [ a :ExpEType; :type "section"; :ns "urn:com:books-r-us" ] . 22:04:14 [ a :ExpEType; :type "title"; :ns "urn:com:books-r-us" ] . 22:04:16 [ a :ExpEType; :type "signing"; :ns "urn:com:books-r-us" ] . 22:04:18 [ a :ExpEType; :type "author"; :ns "urn:com:books-r-us" ] . 22:04:20 [ a :ExpAName; :name "title"; :eltype "author"; :elns "urn:com:books-r-us" ] . 22:04:22 [ a :ExpAName; :name "name"; :eltype "author"; :elns "urn:com:books-r-us" ] . 22:04:24 [ a :ExpEType; :type "book"; :ns "urn:com:books-r-us" ] . 22:04:26 [ a :ExpAName; :name "title"; :eltype "book"; :elns "urn:com:books-r-us" ] . 22:04:28 [ a :ExpAName; :name "price"; :eltype "book"; :elns "urn:com:books-r-us" ] . 22:06:50 Dunno what URIs to use for @prefix : . though 22:07:41 The XMLNS specification doesn't give one... duh 22:08:59 Hmm... and this must have been discussed before. Better research it 22:12:11 Heh! Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur 22:12:24 From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Jul/0046 22:24:00 sbp has quit (Ping timeout for sbp[p85s13a07.client.global.net.uk]) 22:30:23 danja has joined #rdfig 22:54:38 danja has quit (Ping timeout for danja[host213-122-21-194.btinternet.com]) 23:24:28 sbp has joined #rdfig 23:28:59 sbp has quit (Ping timeout for sbp[p7Ds10a06.client.global.net.uk]) 23:49:12 GabeW has joined #rdfig