This is an automatically generated IRC chat log made by the logger bot from the Semantic Web Interest Group IRC chat at irc://irc.freenode.net/rdfig (also known as server irc.freenode.net channel #rdfig if that URI does not work for you).
NOTICE: #rdfig logs are being turned off 2004-12-03. Please
switch to the new and
shiny #swig channel for Semantic Web Interest Group chat.
Change your client to #swig and enjoy the new experience.
Or read the latest #swig logs
to see what you've been missing :)
Semantic Web Interest Group Logs > 2003 > 2003-03 > 2003-03-28 (Latest) (Search)
00:08:32 <deltab> any questions about bittorrent I can answer?
00:15:01 <danbri> Q:It's perhaps more English than European, but funny anyways :)
00:15:02 <dc_rdfig> Added comment Q3.
00:15:22 <danbri> Q2:we're also wondering about a map of semantic web researchers in Europe.
00:15:23 <dc_rdfig> Replaced comment Q2.
00:15:44 <bitsko> deltab: re BT, only if you can tell us when they'll be making it more dynamic ;)
00:16:39 <deltab> dynamic?
00:17:56 <bitsko> BT (more the tool than the protocol, afaict) appears to favor static files and directories
00:18:40 <bitsko> an Apache mod_torrent would be nice, for example
00:18:47 <deltab> yes, since hose can easily be shared
00:20:18 <bitsko> DanC and I were talking about SourceForge a short while back. altho SF downloads themselves are fairly static, the current BT implementation wouldn't be good for SF
00:20:34 <bitsko> because as a whole, SF is very dynamic
00:24:02 <bitsko> BitTorrent would also appear to be a good solution for the growing aggregation problem, where N clients are hitting a site's server M times an hour or day. instead, the site could run a tracker and peers could carry a lot of traffic
00:24:39 <bitsko> bitsko is now known as bitsko|away
00:30:54 <deltab> hmm, not sure how that would work
00:38:34 <danbri> a lot of news sites are overloaded this week, maybe they'd be a timely audience?
00:44:53 <danbri>http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/Validator?url=http%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.com%2Ffoaf%2F0.1%2Findex.rdf&level=Full&abstract=yes
00:44:54 <dc_rdfig> A: http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/Validator?url=http%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.com%2Ffoaf%2F0.1%2Findex.rdf&level=Full&abstract=yes from danbri
00:45:01 <danbri> A:|FOAF is OWL Full!
00:45:02 <dc_rdfig> Titled item A.
00:46:14 <danbri> A:Not DL or Lite though
00:46:14 <dc_rdfig> Added comment A1.
00:47:52 <danbri> A:Hmm it seems to guess ObjectProperty and DataProperty from triples in the schema, eg. for some reason concludes ObjectProperty(rdfs:seeAlso) without imho any obvious justification.
00:47:52 <dc_rdfig> Added comment A2.
00:56:59 <jeremiah> anyone know of an RDF schema for filesystem data?
01:09:36 <AaronSw> AaronSw is now known as AaronSw-JP
01:14:21 <danbri> ' The value of rdf:ID must match the XML Name production, (as modified by XML Namespaces). '
01:14:32 <danbri> ...anyone have a regex corresponding to this constraint?
01:14:38 <danbri> (for RDF/XML syntax)
01:14:44 <danbri> hi Aaron!
01:16:50 <danbri> will this do? /^[A-Za-z_:][\w\.\-:]*$/
01:17:55 <AaronSw-JP> hi
01:37:13 <eikeon> danbri: depends if you want to handle unicode... here is what rdflib uses: http://rdflib.net/cvs/rdflib/rdflib/syntax/xml_names.py?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
01:52:10 <danbri> eikeon, thanks... filed away for future reference
01:52:32 <danbri> I removed the : chars, as was using this to check values of rdf:ID, rdf:nodeID etc
01:53:38 <danbri> hm http://www.w3.org/2001/12/rubyrdf/pack/tests/ts_rdftests-out.txt is down to 23 failures. Was thirty-something earlier...
03:08:58 <DanC> jeremiah, ... RDF schema for filesystem data ... Brian McBride demo'd one in Cambridge; TimBL was working on something similar.
03:09:51 <DanC> see http://www.w3.org/2003/03/07-swarch-irc#T16-43-58
03:11:41 <jeremiah> DanC: thanks
03:13:26 * DanC adds a pointer to http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFApplicationsAndProjects
03:17:24 <DanC> hmm... RDFApplicationsAndProjects is a mouthful... CategorySchema ... CategoryVocabulary
03:17:44 <DanC> hm... ClassSchema
03:17:55 <DanC> hmm... TypeSchema
03:26:26 <jeremiah> I think RDFApplicationsAndProjects explains what it is pretty nicely
03:27:08 <DanC> I wonder if/when FileSystemSchema deserves its own node
03:32:35 <jeremiah> has Brian McBride published his stuff?
03:32:54 <jeremiah> i can't find anything
03:33:29 <DanC> umm...
03:33:59 <DanC> hmm... no; at least: he didn't give pointers during the meeting.
03:34:25 <jeremiah> ok
03:35:43 * jeremiah < afk
03:43:03 <bitsko|away> bitsko|away is now known as bitsko
03:43:52 <bitsko> quick q: is anyone using XSLT to style RDF? like a FOAF-box or RSS-box, for example
03:47:39 <bitsko> seen randomly: "Actually, I've gotten a lot more consensus built (e.g. at work) around RDF-as-graph-structure vs. RDF-as-how-to-describe-what-we-know."
03:48:07 <bitsko> BLURB:Is anyone using XSLT to style RDF?
03:48:08 <dc_rdfig> B: Is anyone using XSLT to style RDF? from bitsko
03:48:35 <bitsko> B:like a FOAF-box or RSS-box, for example.
03:48:35 <dc_rdfig> Added comment B1.
03:49:24 <bitsko> B:append answers to chump item B:, thx!
03:49:24 <dc_rdfig> Added comment B2.
03:49:36 <bitsko> bitsko is now known as bitsko|away
03:50:17 <DanC> B:like [http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/#sw-sql|this formatted participants list]?
03:50:17 <dc_rdfig> Added comment B3.
03:50:55 <DanC> B:I think we've got some RDF schemas styled with XSLT too... RyanLee?
03:50:56 <dc_rdfig> Added comment B4.
03:51:58 <DanC> B:hmm... another for [http://esw.w3.org/topic/FaqIdeas|FaqIdeas]?
03:51:58 <dc_rdfig> Added comment B5.
04:54:22 <DanC>http://www.w3.org/2003/03/semantic-tour
04:54:22 <dc_rdfig> C: http://www.w3.org/2003/03/semantic-tour from DanC
04:54:29 <DanC> C:|W3C Semantic Tour
04:54:29 <dc_rdfig> Titled item C.
04:54:34 <DanC> C:10 - 24 June 2003
04:54:34 <dc_rdfig> Added comment C1.
04:54:42 <DanC> C:Roma, London, Munich, Athens and Brussels
04:54:42 <dc_rdfig> Added comment C2.
04:54:47 <DanC> C:hmm... news to me.
04:54:47 <dc_rdfig> Added comment C3.
08:50:54 <arnarl> hi
08:51:22 <golbeck> golbeck is now known as golbeck_zzz
08:58:54 <tav> tav is now known as tav|offline
10:11:58 <grault> grault is now known as earle
10:42:37 <danbri>http://jibbering.com/rdf-parser/
10:42:38 <dc_rdfig> D: http://jibbering.com/rdf-parser/ from danbri
10:42:55 <danbri> D:|Simple javascript RDF Parser and query thingy, by Jim Ley
10:42:55 <dc_rdfig> Titled item D.
10:43:27 <danbri>http://www.jibbering.com/2002/8/foaf-people-map.svg
10:43:27 <dc_rdfig> E: http://www.jibbering.com/2002/8/foaf-people-map.svg from danbri
10:43:38 <danbri> D:|FOAF People Map in SVG, by Jim Ley
10:43:38 <dc_rdfig> Titled item D.
10:44:05 <JibberJim> no, that's E - can you also change it to http://jibbering.com/foaf/foaf-people-map.svg as the other is no longer maintained.
10:44:25 <danbri> E:Code is [http://rdfweb.org/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/foafnaut.org/htdocs/foaf/|in CVS] on [http://www.foafnaut.org/|foafnaut.org]
10:44:25 <dc_rdfig> Added comment E1.
10:44:29 <danbri> willdo
10:44:33 <danbri> D:|Simple javascript RDF Parser and query thingy, by Jim Ley
10:44:34 <dc_rdfig> Titled item D.
10:44:50 <danbri> E:|FOAF People Map in SVG, by Jim Ley (wrong url, see comments)
10:44:50 <dc_rdfig> Titled item E.
10:45:22 <danbri> E:See [http://jibbering.com/foaf/foaf-people-map.svg|more recent version], sorry for posting stale url.
10:45:23 <dc_rdfig> Added comment E2.
10:45:25 <danbri> that ok?
10:45:38 <JibberJim> sure.
10:45:56 <JibberJim> E: They are actually identical currently...
10:45:57 <dc_rdfig> Added comment E3.
10:46:12 <libby> you can chage the url by doing E:=
10:46:14 <libby> I think
10:46:21 <danbri> ah
10:46:25 <danbri> feel free to try
10:46:36 <libby> E:=http://jibbering.com/foaf/foaf-people-map.svg
10:46:37 <dc_rdfig> Replaced URL of E.
10:46:40 <libby> ha!
10:46:52 <libby> so now we can lose E2....
10:46:58 <libby> E2:""
10:46:58 <dc_rdfig> Deleted comment E2.
10:47:03 <danbri> E2:This is great, but I now want to figure out how to run it server side...
10:47:03 <libby> that ok?
10:47:03 <dc_rdfig> Replaced comment E2.
10:47:08 <danbri> ta
10:48:24 <JibberJim> E: but it's much more interesting on the client, as it demonstrates how parsing some RDF on the client, can then make the client go and request other relevant RDF docs for more information.
10:48:24 <dc_rdfig> Added comment E3.
10:51:15 <arnarl> arnarl is now known as arnarl|away
10:54:36 <earle> earle is now known as grault
14:35:53 <hugo_> hugo_ is now known as hugo
14:48:32 <danbri>http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/coords.html#GeographicCoordinates
14:48:34 <dc_rdfig> F: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/coords.html#GeographicCoordinates from danbri
14:48:46 <danbri> F:|7.12 Geographic Coordinate Systems, SVG 1.1 spec
14:48:47 <dc_rdfig> Titled item F.
14:48:54 <danbri> F:"In order to allow interoperability between SVG content generators and user agents dealing with maps encoded in SVG, SVG encourages the use of a common metadata definition for describing the coordinate system used to generate SVG documents."
14:48:54 <dc_rdfig> Added comment F1.
14:49:04 <danbri> F:"Such metadata should be added under the 'metadata' element of the topmost 'svg' element describing the map. They consist of an RDF description of the Coordinate Reference System definition used to generate the SVG map."
14:49:04 <dc_rdfig> Added comment F2.
14:49:50 <danbri> F:I hadn't noticed this before. Very interesting. Anyone studied it in detail?
14:49:50 <dc_rdfig> Added comment F3.
14:49:51 <danbri> F:
14:49:51 <dc_rdfig>http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/coords.html#GeographicCoordinates
14:49:52 <dc_rdfig> 7.12 Geographic Coordinate Systems, SVG 1.1 spec
14:49:53 <dc_rdfig> (1:danbri) "In order to allow interoperability between SVG content generators and user agents dealing with maps encoded in SVG, SVG encourages the use of a common metadata definition for describing the coordinate system used to generate SVG documents."
14:49:54 <dc_rdfig> (2:danbri) "Such metadata should be added under the 'metadata' element of the topmost 'svg' element describing the map. They consist of an RDF description of the Coordinate Reference System definition used to generate the SVG map."
14:49:55 <dc_rdfig> (3:danbri) I hadn't noticed this before. Very interesting. Anyone studied it in detail?
14:50:55 <DanC> danbri, pls notify SemWeb CG about that, ok?
14:51:54 <DanC> hmm... ScheduledTopicChat on geo? mix it in with RdfCalendar?
14:52:38 <DanC> it's sorta the obvious benefit of using RDF for calendar info: you can mix in data about places (and people and documents and ...).
14:53:04 <DanC> e.g. my travel foafwho/travelschedule/itinerary stuff
14:53:37 <danbri> sw cg: done
14:53:49 * DanC scribbles in the wiki...
14:54:52 <danbri> chat on geo, makes sense to me
14:55:01 <danbri> there's growing interesting in rdf and mapping, from what i've seen
14:55:15 <danbri> jo walsh (zool) has been introducing lots of interesting folks to each other, too
14:55:43 <nmg> indeed
14:56:24 <DanC> logger, pointer?
14:57:00 <DanC> logger_1, pointer?
14:57:00 <DanC> See http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-03-28#T14-57-00
14:57:34 * DanC wonders how to make an <a name="agendaRequests">...</a> in MoinMoin
15:02:29 <bitsko|away> DanC: [[Anchor(agendaRequests)]], iirc
15:02:48 <bitsko|away> it's a "point" anchor, not a "span" anchor
15:03:58 <bitsko|away> confirmed via HelpContents:HelpOnMacros
15:04:19 <DanC> indeed...
15:04:31 <bitsko|away> bitsko|away is now known as bitsko
15:04:41 <DanC> F:added to [http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfCalendar#agendaRequests wiki list of RDF calendar agenda requests]
15:04:41 <dc_rdfig> Added comment F4.
15:40:42 <DanC> BLURB: WishList++: backlink bookmarklet
15:40:43 <dc_rdfig> G: WishList++: backlink bookmarklet from DanC
15:40:54 <DanC> G:surely somebody's done this, yes?
15:40:54 <dc_rdfig> Added comment G1.
15:41:08 <DanC> B:based on google's backlink service, for example
15:41:08 <dc_rdfig> Added comment B6.
15:41:18 <DanC> .google backlink bookmarklet
15:41:19 <datum> backlink bookmarklet: http://www.rjsjr.org/articles/bmbacklinks/
16:15:40 <danbri>http://www.iajapan.org/hotline/2003mobilepro-en.html
16:15:41 <dc_rdfig> H: http://www.iajapan.org/hotline/2003mobilepro-en.html from danbri
16:15:46 <danbri> H:|Programme for the Children, Mobile Phones and the Internet Experts' Meeting
16:15:46 <danbri> at the Mitsubishi Research Institute, Tokyo, March 2003
16:15:46 <dc_rdfig> Titled item H.
16:16:02 <danbri> H:cf esw:ContentSelection4SemanticWeb
16:16:03 <dc_rdfig> Added comment H1.
16:20:01 <bitsko> F:Revision notes for Geography Markup Language ([http://opengis.org/techno/implementation.htm|GML]) 2.0 indicate "purged RDF remnants". GML is now at 3.0. Only [GML 1.0|http://www.opengis.org/techno/specs/00-029/GML.html] had an RDF profile.
16:20:01 <dc_rdfig> Added comment F5.
16:25:25 <danbri> F:
16:25:25 <dc_rdfig>http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/coords.html#GeographicCoordinates
16:25:26 <dc_rdfig> 7.12 Geographic Coordinate Systems, SVG 1.1 spec
16:25:28 <dc_rdfig> (1:danbri) "In order to allow interoperability between SVG content generators and user agents dealing with maps encoded in SVG, SVG encourages the use of a common metadata definition for describing the coordinate system used to generate SVG documents."
16:25:28 <dc_rdfig> (2:danbri) "Such metadata should be added under the 'metadata' element of the topmost 'svg' element describing the map. They consist of an RDF description of the Coordinate Reference System definition used to generate the SVG map."
16:25:29 <dc_rdfig> (3:danbri) I hadn't noticed this before. Very interesting. Anyone studied it in detail?
16:25:30 <dc_rdfig> (4:DanC) added to [http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfCalendar#agendaRequests wiki list of RDF calendar agenda requests]
16:25:32 <dc_rdfig> (5:bitsko) Revision notes for Geography Markup Language ([http://opengis.org/techno/implementation.htm|GML]) 2.0 indicate "purged RDF remnants". GML is now at 3.0. Only [GML 1.0|http://www.opengis.org/techno/specs/00-029/GML.html] had an RDF profile.
17:03:39 <jordan>http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/03/24/XMLisOK
17:03:40 <dc_rdfig> I: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/03/24/XMLisOK from jordan
17:03:46 <jordan> I:|Why XML Doesn't Suck
17:03:46 <dc_rdfig> Titled item I.
17:08:14 <danbri> F:I also have some [http://esw.w3.org/topic/GeoInfo|Geo notes] in the Wiki, and [http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/|on the sketchy geo vocab workspace] I started in January.
17:08:14 <dc_rdfig> Added comment F6.
17:10:28 <danbri> F:Also related to the [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Mar/0014.html|'opening hours'] rdf cal use case discussions and the [http://esw.w3.org/topic/EventDiscovery|EventDiscovery] use case. Finding opening hours is one thing, finding relevantly local open businesses is another...
17:10:28 <dc_rdfig> Added comment F7.
17:13:11 * danbri drops a backpointer in http://esw.w3.org/topic/EventDiscovery
17:35:53 <danbri>http://esw.w3.org/topic/OpeningHoursUseCase
17:35:53 <dc_rdfig> J: http://esw.w3.org/topic/OpeningHoursUseCase from danbri
17:36:27 <danbri> J:|esw.OpenHoursUseCase, linked from esw.RdfCalendar
17:36:27 <dc_rdfig> Titled item J.
17:36:35 <danbri> J:"We should be able to use the (Semantic) Web to find out when businesses are open for business."
17:36:35 <dc_rdfig> Added comment J1.
17:37:26 <danbri> J:First cut at summarising from email threads. I like the idea of using Wiki for this, but have a practical hurdle: how to quote XML markup examples?
17:37:27 <dc_rdfig> Added comment J2.
17:37:35 <danbri> J:RTFM time...
17:37:35 <dc_rdfig> Added comment J3.
17:53:13 <DanC> J: {{{ <xml-markup-here/> }}}
17:53:14 <dc_rdfig> Added comment J4.
17:54:14 <DanC> J4: {{{ <xml-markup-here/> }}} , with apologise for neglecting to CheckSpecAndCite
17:54:14 <dc_rdfig> Replaced comment J4.
17:54:27 <DanC> J4: {{{ <xml-markup-here/> }}} , with apology for neglecting to CheckSpecAndCite
17:54:27 <dc_rdfig> Replaced comment J4.
17:55:09 <danbri> I wonder about including the full thing inline... yeah, why not... no shame in verbosity
17:55:17 <danbri> can always break it out later, cheap
17:57:12 * danbri edits
17:57:55 <bitsko> Moin does have some techniques for using non-wiki-markup pages, incl. specifically XML and Python scripts
17:58:24 <danbri> is {{{ just generic escaping?
17:59:10 <libby> can anyone tell me whether there's a seealso type thing for pointing at html?
17:59:17 <bitsko> any wiki page can have a #format FORMAT pragma to indicate its format, and XML is recognized by its leading <!xml> declaration
17:59:48 <bitsko> {{{ == <tt>, in inline, and {{{ == <pre>, in blocks
18:00:02 <bitsko> "seealso"?
18:00:29 <bitsko> notably, {{{ is also only closed by }}}, everything within is literal
18:01:31 <libby> as I understand it, seealso is best used to point to RDF only
18:03:12 <danbri> yes, best for things that have an RDF payload somehow
18:03:24 <danbri> dc:source?
18:04:25 <libby> no, it' not source, but more information in html...
18:08:16 * danbri saves http://esw.w3.org/topic/OpeningHoursUseCase
18:08:31 <danbri> ...with XML example. Pretty rough, i got muddled about which example
18:08:59 <danbri> whether to stick with the restaurant in Boston, or do a local shop from Bristol, for which i can get photo, gps'd location etc more easily
18:12:04 * danbri adds wishlist to http://esw.w3.org/topic/OpeningHoursUseCase
18:12:07 <danbri> ...and gives up for now
19:21:13 <danbri>http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/26/patterns.html
19:21:14 <dc_rdfig> K: http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/26/patterns.html from danbri
19:21:35 <danbri> K:|Architectural Design Patterns for XML Documents, by Kyle Downey (xml.com, March 26, 2003)
19:21:35 <dc_rdfig> Titled item K.
19:22:00 <danbri> K:"XML has been used enough now that some high-level patterns are starting to emerge. Some patterns revolve around the low-level details of good schema design, like those put together by Dare Obasanjo in "W3C XML Schema Design Patterns"; but when you have a blank sheet of paper in front of you and you're ready to start designing your new XML format, you want patterns to guide you at a higher level. "
19:22:00 <dc_rdfig> Added comment K1.
19:22:08 <danbri> K:"This article attempts to document a few whole-document design patterns that have proven themselves in the field."
19:22:08 <dc_rdfig> Added comment K2.
19:22:15 <deltab> K:|XML.com: Architectural Design Patterns for XML Documents [Mar. 26, 2003]
19:22:15 <dc_rdfig> Titled item K.
19:23:00 <danbri> K:I've only skmmed this for now, looks interesting. Uses DC in RDF example, using XML schema composition.
19:23:00 <dc_rdfig> Added comment K3.
19:23:14 <dajobe> uh oh
19:23:31 <danbri> K:"One of the strong arguments for Composition -- aside from the well-documented programmer's virtue of laziness -- is that you can lean on the more specialized knowledge of others. The people who put together Dublin Core put a lot of thought into how to best represent document metadata. They have been doing it since 1994. Most likely, you've been thinking about how to put meta-information into your document since two paragraphs ago. The
19:23:31 <danbri> atch. So your choice is either to get taken down by an angry librarian who's breaking noses and taking names or reuse the work. This design pattern recommends the latter."
19:23:31 <dc_rdfig> Added comment K4.
19:23:51 <DanC> K:I'm hoping we develop a Semantic Web pattern language in [http://esw.w3.org/topic/|the ESW Wiki]
19:23:51 <dc_rdfig> Added comment K5.
19:23:52 <danbri> K:..."There's no match. So your choice is either to get taken down by an angry librarian who's breaking noses and taking names or reuse the work. This design pattern recommends the latter."
19:23:52 <dc_rdfig> Added comment K6.
19:24:43 <danbri> K4:"One of the strong arguments for Composition -- aside from the well-documented programmer's virtue of laziness -- is that you can lean on the more specialized knowledge of others. The people who put together Dublin Core put a lot of thought into how to best represent document metadata. They have been doing it since 1994. Most likely, you've been thinking about how to put meta-information into your document since two paragraphs ago. "
19:24:44 <dc_rdfig> Replaced comment K4.
19:26:31 <danbri> K:I'm not quite sure what a SW pattern language would be, but I've high hopes for the Wiki as a place for scribbling and refining notes on realworld SW problem solving.
19:26:31 <dc_rdfig> Added comment K7.
19:28:08 <danbri> K:In a sense, ontologies individually capture 'patterns', perhaps the Wiki provides more human-oriented documentation on how ontologies fit together to solve problems...?
19:28:08 <dc_rdfig> Added comment K8.
19:30:08 <golbeck_zzz> golbeck_zzz is now known as golbeck
19:33:06 * danbri uhohs at http://www.aljazeerah.info/Cartoons/Today's%20cartoons.htm
19:41:40 * danbri starts http://esw.w3.org/topic/CreativeCommons
19:41:52 <danbri> ...not much for now, but a start
19:52:43 <bitsko> RDF also is a "known use" for Dynamic Document
19:52:57 <bitsko> specifically in context of marshalling
19:57:27 <bitsko> K:For the Dynamic Document pattern, RDF can also be considered a "Known Use" in the marshalling context as persistence or encoding uses.
19:57:27 <dc_rdfig> Added comment K9.
20:45:32 <jhendler_>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0259.html
20:45:33 <dc_rdfig> L: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0259.html from jhendler_
20:45:53 <jhendler_>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0260.html
20:45:53 <dc_rdfig> M: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0260.html from jhendler_
20:46:16 <jhendler_> L:| Semantika
20:46:16 <dc_rdfig> Titled item L.
20:46:44 <jhendler_> L: A little humor/humour from the WOWG world. Mostly inside jokes, but thought some on this list might enjoy.
20:46:44 <dc_rdfig> Added comment L1.
20:46:52 <jhendler_> M: OWLbury Tales
20:46:52 <dc_rdfig> Added comment M1.
20:47:03 <jhendler_> M:| OWLbury Tales
20:47:03 <dc_rdfig> Titled item M.
20:47:14 <jhendler_> M: See note on "semantika"
20:47:15 <dc_rdfig> Added comment M2.
20:47:43 <jhendler_> M: humo(u)r released to celebrate WOWG decision to move documents to Last Call
20:47:43 <dc_rdfig> Added comment M3.
20:49:13 <jhendler_> M1:" "
20:49:13 <dc_rdfig> Replaced comment M1.
20:49:17 <jhendler_> M1:""
20:49:17 <dc_rdfig> Deleted comment M1.
20:49:54 * jhendler_ wonders if we couldn't have an entire vi-like interface for editing the chumps - already seem to have a complicated command langauge :->
22:33:39 <dom__> B: [http://www.w3.org/2002/06/rdfs2html.xsl|the RDF Schema formatter] uses XSLT to style RDF Schemas
22:33:40 <dc_rdfig> Added comment B7.
22:36:14 <dom__> B: (see it in action on the [http://www.w3.org/2002/01/pedal/pedal|PEDAL RDF schema] if your browser is XSLT-happy)
22:36:14 <dc_rdfig> Added comment B8.
22:59:05 <dajobe> logger_1, where am i?
22:59:05 <dajobe> See http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-03-28#T22-59-05
22:59:16 <dajobe> B:these [http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-03-28#T22-59-05|very chatlogs]
22:59:16 <dc_rdfig> Added comment B9.
The IRC chat here was automatically logged without editing and contains content written by the chat participants identified by their IRC nick. No other identity is recorded.
Alternate versions:
and
Text
Provided by Dave Beckett. Hosted by Useful Information Company.